Marie pictures!!!!

[Papilia]

Well you can say it's Josefin's fault to let anybody (who's added by her) have the possibility to copy her photos. Maybe she knows that it's possible, maybe not.

Talking only for myself - I would not post anybody's pix shown on facebook although it was possible even though it was Josefin or any other celebrity who has added me as friend.

[crashroxer]

Of course she knows that her pics could be "stolen" from some of her 'friends'. Well...i think she doesn't care much about it. Hej, she's just a normal teenager who wants to share some pics from herself in the internet...

[DoraHun]

Hello, I'm quite new here, and I found this "facebook-case" quite interesting...
I agree with you, Papilia!
And Crashroxer, you're also right, when saying that "She's a normal teenager who wants to share some pics from herself on the internet"-that is why it is questionable whether it is fair or not to "steal" her pix...
But it is alsom possible that Roxvan is a friend of her, and asked her whether she could use those pix or not, hmmm? Well, I don't know... but I'm really curious about it!

[nordish-by-nature]

Of course she knows that her pics could be "stolen" from some of her 'friends'. Well...i think she doesn't care much about it. Hej, she's just a normal teenager who wants to share some pics from herself in the internet...

Yep, you may be right. Who cares! It was her special day and I'm more interested in what her talented magic mum is doing.

[crashroxer]

Yeah....and i agree one more time So, maybe her mother took that picture in the church than...

[whateveriam]

Of course she knows that her pics could be "stolen" from some of her 'friends'. Well...i think she doesn't care much about it. Hej, she's just a normal teenager who wants to share some pics from herself in the internet...

Stolen by some of the friends, not stolen from.  That implies that they have been stolen from the friends, when it has been the friends who have taken them.  Ya dig?

[Raëlian]

I don't think it is fair to post private pix you have taken out of a private profile of one of Marie's family members. Don't like that at all!!

If you want to keep your private pics as private as possible, you burn them into a CD-R (if printed, into a box well hidden in a drawer). But you don't put them online, in Facebook, Fotolog, whatever. She's aware privacy and internet is not the best combination.

Anyway, if she's not worried, why we should? Even if published here in the forum, how many people will see them? 15, 20? I don't think there's a global interest in Josefin's confirmation.

[Txiqui]

Its not right to publish private pictures from a teenager just because her mother is a celebrity. If Marie wasn't Josefines mother do you think that those pics would be published by littlemarie or any other website???
There's something called respect.... but i guess the webmasters of that site don't know what this word means. If those pics where meant to be public, they would have been published by press or shared to a public website. Beeing a member of facebook doesn't give you the right to publish private pictures of you "friends".

[whateveriam]

Its not right to publish private pictures from a teenager just because her mother is a celebrity. If Marie wasn't Josefines mother do you think that those pics would be published by littlemarie or any other website???
There's something called respect.... but i guess the webmasters of that site don't know what this word means. If those pics where meant to be public, they would have been published by press or shared to a public website. Beeing a member of facebook doesn't give you the right to publish private pictures of you "friends".

You took the words right out of my mouth.  The official ones that are on the site I have no issue with - they're quite clearly just press pics.  No decent photojournalist would ever consider taking pictures inside the church just because one of the people to be confirmed has a famous parent, or they would at least try and get permission from people to do so.  The pictures from Facebook are quite clearly from a basic digicam - they're personal pictures, not professional ones, and although they are in the public domain, people, unless directly related to her (close friends, family) should, if they have any respect at all for her, leave well alone.  Look, but don't touch.

I hope that, if they have been taken from Facebook without permission, they are removed promptly.  LittleMarie's attempts at oneupmanship have gone far enough now, thanks. 

[Raëlian]

Some people is making a drama out of nothing. I only see a church-choir and Marie back to the camera, is it so disturbing to anybody's privacy?

[carola]

littlestalker.net does not care and will never care about privacy but this is old news, isn't it? and thanks to the creator of this wordplay!

[lokura]

The pictures from Facebook are quite clearly from a basic digicam - they're personal pictures, not professional ones, and although they are in the public domain, people, unless directly related to her (close friends, family) should, if they have any respect at all for her, leave well alone.  Look, but don't touch.

I hope that, if they have been taken from Facebook without permission, they are removed promptly.  LittleMarie's attempts at oneupmanship have gone far enough now, thanks. 

  agree 100%

[Locachica]

OK, I know that if you put pictures up on Facebook, they're essentially public domain.  But, as, or if they're personal PRIVATE pics (and a childs at that), people should respect that and not steal them to get one up on other sites (ie TDR). 

I think we have other... worries (values?) than posting private pictures or news (!) on Marie's daughter confirmation
I find it even sick that reporters even found interesting the fact that she confirmated and waited outside the hotel to shoot some flashes...still they didn't take pictures inside the church.. little respect left?

[DoraHun]

I also agree with you, Whateveriam!

[tini]

couldn`t agree more about marie`s (and her family`s) privacy - just because someone is famous it doesn`t mean that we have the right to know every single thing about them and what they`re doing 24/7.

as for josefin and oscar using the internet (i hope they don`t find some of the disgusting stories/articles that have been written about per and marie) - i`d like to think that they are careful about using the internet - especially sites like facebook - the internet can be a wonderful source of information but with all the wierdos out there it can also be very dangerous.  still, i`m sure marie and micke are more than aware of what their children are up to.

[sarahdenrara]

Some people is making a drama out of nothing. I only see a church-choir and Marie back to the camera, is it so disturbing to anybody's privacy?

it's not necessarily about what you see on these photos, it's about the fact that someone takes these private photos from a 15-year-old's facebook who happens to have a famous mother, that's just going too far...way too far if you ask me!

I find it even sick that reporters even found interesting the fact that she confirmated and waited outside the hotel to shoot some flashes...still they didn't take pictures inside the church.. little respect left?

Judith if you go to hotgossip.se where the 'official' press photos are from you can see in the other photos posted there that those posed ones are not taken outside the church or hotel, they're taken outside restaurant Josefinas which is a restaurant on Djurgården in central Stockholm